Thread:Byte Me/@comment-27159088-20160109045905/@comment-27159088-20160109074747

Think I got most of what you're saying here and so you know, am willing to follow any format laid out as consistancy is important.

I've got .txt copies of each of the pages content, and will redo them when finished with what's being worked on at the moment. So if you want to go ahead and delete those pages it would be a problem for me to replace them using the names: "kill the bandits (agroprom)"  and "kill the zombies (agroprom)" (if those names need revision, just let me know as a rose is a rose to me).

I like the Spartan approach, and so you know am still feeling my way around with the wording used. Additonally, am not 'married' to anything I write and believe consistency is of more importance. So if someone takes a hatchet to anything penned and the result is an improvement, it might give me cause to go knife a bloodsucker but it won't rustle my jimmies.

Onward:

At the moment I'm working on Ammo pictures. Have all 26 of them created and added one of them to the photo section VOG-25R grenade.

Don't know how to add a gallery category (Ammunition) and think dropping them in with the bulk of the photos might add clutter that could easily be avoided by a little pre-planning. If over thinking this, let me know. After the pis are loaded each of the ammunition pages will be editied to include the applicable image and proofed to make sure they have the same format and the correct verbage. Am thinking an information block similar to those used elsewhere would keep with the existing continuity. As in:

ammoname = VOG-25R grenade
 * image = VOG-25R grenade
 * imagedesc = VOG-25R grenade
 * Weapons Using: = *GP-25 Kostyer grenade launcher


 * Tunder S14


 * Bulldog 6

The Description would be off to the left hand side to give a visual balance to the page.

Your thoughts on this would be appreciated.

oh, one last point. Something that bothered me after arriving here were the unlinked references (the links showing up in red) so am going to make a conserted effort to track them down and either correct the reference (typos) or add the missing page. Have a decent handle on the editing now but am still stumbling around the organizational layout. Will msg you with any questions arising before sallying forth. It's going to be a protracted effort and am under no illusion of ever getting it fully completed, but think doing so will make it easier for those looking for answers.